The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulates credit reporting and administers the rules that govern credit reporting agencies Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion. Ultimately, the FTC enforces laws that protect consumers, such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). This legislation aims to guarantee the accuracy, fairness, and privacy of files collected by the agencies mentioned above.
The act requires that these agencies provide individuals with copies of their credit report, allowing them to question any potential inaccuracies. Should any consumer raise a concern, the agency involved has a responsibility to follow through with an investigation, correcting any erroneous data. The three credit agencies compile reports based on the information they receive from various creditors, releasing the data to businesses and other creditors when they demonstrate a need for it. Today, credit scores play a primary role in business decisions, as creditors must exercise great care to avoid potential problems.
Many do not think of utility companies as creditors, but they extend service credit to their customers, allowing them to benefit from the utility now and pay for it later. To that extent, utility companies may report to the three agencies. Because sending credit information is not free, different companies adopt different policies. Some send reports only for those customers who pay late or not at all, whereas others file for both positive and negative accounts.
Utility companies may use reporting to encourage timely payments. When customers know that the utility company will file a report, they have more incentive to pay on time. On the other hand, reporting to credit agencies may cause the utility company money if the number of consumer complaints rises. Such an increase would necessitate more employees and different training.
In addition, an angry consumer may raise legal action through the FCRA, especially if he or she feels the utility company has bullied timely payments by threatening reports to credit agencies. Utility companies already have the option of assessing fees for late payments, making unpaid claims a double burden on the consumer. Instead of pursuing such policies, utility companies may want to consider instituting payment plans, which encourages the consumer to work with the utility provider rather than opt for legal action against it.
About the Author:
A resident of Michigan, Jeffrey K. Bearss is an attorney with Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA, where he has practiced collection, probate, and family law, among other specialties. Working with a variety of creditors and lenders, he offers expert counsel and representation with a team of other attorneys. Regarded as an expert in his field, Jeffrey K. Bearss has presented on issues related to collection law before several organizations, including the National Business Institute.